Glass City Jungle

SEIU applauds historic House of Representatives vote on Health Insurance reform

08 Nov 2009

This in via e-mail from SEIU District 1199:

Service Employees Applaud Historic House Vote for Health Insurance Reform that Works for Ohio Families

Rep. Kaptur votes to give constituents the choice of quality care they can afford

COLUMBUS, OHIO-Today’s vote by the House of Representatives to pass the America’s Affordable Health Choices Act (H.R. 3962) is an historic step towards creating a high-quality healthcare system that working families in Ohio can afford.

“By voting yes on the Affordable Health Choices Act, Congresswoman Kaptur put the needs of working families in her District before insurance company profits,” said Becky Williams, President of SEIU District 1199. “Comprehensive health insurance reform is in our reach. Americans will soon have a choice of affordable, high-quality healthcare coverage.”

The House bill provides quality health insurance that is affordable to 96 percent of the nation, with a strong public option that drives costs down and gives people the power to choose what is best for their family. It also requires individuals, businesses, and government to all share in the responsibility to expand affordable coverage. Employers will be expected to offer and contribute to meaningful coverage for their workers, an improvement that will affect thousands of people here in Ohio.

The Affordable Health Choices Act will offer coverage to 38,000 uninsured residents in Kaptur’s district, and protect up to 1,700 from bankruptcy due to unaffordable healthcare costs-all without adding a dime to our nation’s deficit.

Members of SEIU District 1199 wrote letters and made phone calls urging Congresswoman Kaptur to support comprehensive health insurance reform. “Congresswoman Kaptur showed true leadership by voting yes to real reform and no to powerful insurance companies,” Williams said. “Now, it’s up to our senators to show the same type of leadership so we can pass meaningful healthcare reform this year.”

11 Responses to “SEIU applauds historic House of Representatives vote on Health Insurance reform”

  1. 1
    LisaRenee Says:

    Associated Press piece from this morning that is in many of Ohio’s newspapers, Columbus Dispatch as an example:

    The Democratic-controlled House has narrowly passed landmark health care reform legislation, handing President Barack Obama a hard won victory on his signature domestic priority.

    Republicans were nearly unanimous in opposing the plan that would expand coverage to tens of millions of Americans who lack it and place tough new restrictions on the insurance industry.

    The 220-215 vote late Saturday cleared the way for the Senate to begin a long-delayed debate on the issue that has come to overshadow all others in Congress.

    A triumphant Speaker Nancy Pelosi compared the legislation to the passage of Social Security in 1935 and Medicare 30 years later.

    Obama, who went to Capitol Hill earlier on Saturday to lobby wavering Democrats, said in a statement after the vote, “I look forward to signing it into law by the end of the year.”

    “It provides coverage for 96 percent of Americans. It offers everyone, regardless of health or income, the peace of mind that comes from knowing they will have access to affordable health care when they need it,” said Rep. John Dingell, the 83-year-old Michigan lawmaker who has introduced national health insurance in every Congress since succeeding his father in 1955.

    But minority Republicans cataloged their objections across hours of debate on the 1,990-page, $1.2 trillion legislation.

    “We are going to have a complete government takeover of our health care system faster than you can say, `this is making me sick,’” said Rep. Candice Miller, R-Mich.

  2. 2
    MICHAEL L. FRIEDMAN Says:

    THIS IS A GREAT DAY FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE…I JUST HOPE IT GOES THRU THE SENATE

  3. 3
    Not Again Says:

    No way it goes through the senate. This is dead.

  4. 4
    LisaRenee Says:

    Maybe, much of it depends on what Harry Reid does and then when the Senate changes the bill, if the House will agree…

  5. 5
    LisaRenee Says:

    It should also be pointed out that not all Democrats supported the bill in the House, link to list of names.

  6. 6
    MICHAEL L. FRIEDMAN Says:

    i have not felt this proud of my party since 1964 and 1965, when LBJ put thru voting rights and medecare

  7. 7
    MikeyA Says:

    This bill is D.O.A.

  8. 8
    LisaRenee Says:

    Maybe, I found this one part interesting, “I just don’t think its right to mandate that you have to have health insurance or you might go to jail,” Texas Republican Joe Barton said..

    I sourced that, because it seemed pretty outrageous, (link) and while it was a discussion in the Senate, in reading the complete bill:

    SEC. 59B. TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE.

    `(a) Tax Imposed- In the case of any individual who does not meet the requirements of subsection (d) at any time during the taxable year, there is hereby imposed a tax equal to 2.5 percent of the excess of–

    `(1) the taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year, over

    `(2) the amount of gross income specified in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the taxpayer.

    This would technically mean if a person did not pay the required tax, they would be in violation of the law and if it was deemed a felony, as opposed to a misdemeanor, the maximum penalty is five years in prison…This does not take affect until 2012, and it hasn’t passed the Senate, but I was surprised it hasn’t gotten more attention since basically those who can’t afford health care would have to pay the additional tax, and paying the additional tax does not pay for health insurance. Which I suppose it could be argued for some, it would be cheaper to pay the 2.5% income tax penalty as opposed to buy health insurance.

    Further research is needed as to where that 2.5% penalty would go…

  9. 9
    toledojim Says:

    Do you all really think this is such a great bill? Unemployed people and other poor people will have a lot of trouble paying for their insurance, no matter what plan they are in. According to Section 224 (p. 11 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a “qualified plan” covers and how much you’ll be legally required to pay for it.

    On Nov. 2, the Congressional Budget Office estimated what the plans will likely cost. An individual earning $44,000 before taxes who purchases his own insurance will have to pay a $5,300 premium and an estimated $2,000 in out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $7,300 a year, which is 17% of his pre-tax income. A family earning $102,100 a year before taxes will have to pay a $15,000 premium plus an estimated $5,300 out-of-pocket, for a $20,300 total, or 20% of its pre-tax income. Individuals and families earning less than these amounts will be eligible for subsidies paid directly to their insurer.

    That’s a lot to pay, even for people who are working. This bill is a disaster waiting to happen.

  10. 10
    Doug Says:

    I’m so excited, I can’t wait to tell my children how, just like social security and medicare, here is another program they can expect to pay into thier whole lives but can not count on for it to be available for them in their golden years and how they can then burden thier children with the bill but no benefit.

    What else can we model after the super successful programs of social security, medicare, and medicaid?

  11. 11
    Chad Says:

    A Dark day for our country and especially for our children and grandchildren who will have to pay off this debt!

    Nancy Pelosi will go down as the worst House Speaker in history!

© 2010 Glass City Jungle | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
Design inspired by Design Your Web Page - Powered By Blog Collector

Switch to our mobile site