Glass City Jungle

Sandusky shooting should raise questions about the use of flashbang devices

19 Jul 2010

The Sandusky Sheriff department was contacted by the family of Bryan Jones because he was under the influence of alcohol, had at least one weapon and had threatened to kill his mother. After Jones refused to come out of the house, a flashbang device was set off and when the SWAT team entered the home, Jones was shot and killed by law enforcement officers. Much of the focus has been on the two members of the SWAT team who shot and killed Jones, little of the focus has been on who gave the order to use the flashbang device.

The use of such devices has been a problem in other areas, in May 7-year old Aiyana Stanley Jones was killed after being shot by a member of the Detroit Police forces SWAT team, a flashbang device was used there and according to family, the couch the 7-year old was sleeping on caught fire prior to the shooting.

In a May article on Reason – “Lessons from the Death of Aiyana Stanley-Jones” (link) the use of the flashbang is referenced:

Though touted as “non-lethal,” flashbang grenades have caused a number of deaths and serious injuries. The devices set off a wave of intense light and sound designed to stun everyone inside of a building long enough for police to enter and secure the premises. They’re indiscriminate. Their intended effect is to cause injury to everyone near them. That means they’re effectively a form of punishment on people who have yet to be convicted of any crime. And that includes innocent bystanders as well as suspects. And they are explosives, which means there is a very real risk of injury and destruction. Flashbangs have caused second- and third-degree burns, and ignited fires that have consumed houses.

The night of Aiyana Stanley-Jones’ death, police shot a flashbang grenade through the window of her home. Her family says it landed on the couch where she was sleeping, ignited the blanket laying over her, and set off flames that began to burn the girl just before she was shot. (The autopsy hasn’t yet been released.)

According to the Detroit Free Press, another Detroit-area police department is facing a lawsuit from the elderly couple Leonid and Arlene Marmelshtein, who say police battered into their home and detonated two of the devices during a 2004 marijuana raid. (Police found a small amount of the drug in an adult son’s sock drawer.) According to the Free Press, a police spokesman in that case called the use of the devices “entirely appropriate.” In allowing the lawsuit to go forward, U.S. District Judge Julian Cook disagreed, writing, “No reasonable law enforcement officer would have considered a confused elderly couple to be capable of producing the kind of tense and rapidly evolving uncertain situation which would require 10 police officers to make split-second decisions, including the use of two flash-bang devices.”

The use of the flashbang has been the topic of several court cases where it’s been questioned as a violation of the Fourth Amendment, one example is Boyd v. Benton County; City of Corvallis et al (link)

A court case was recently filed against the City of Detroit for a March 2 raid that involved a flashbang device – (link).

In 2003 (link) 57-year old Alberta Spruill died as a result of:

…a dozen heavily armed police–six officers from the Emergency Service Unit and six regular patrol officers–burst unannounced into her residence. They had a search warrant issued solely on the basis of erroneous information supplied by an unreliable anonymous informer who falsely claimed that illegal guns and drugs were stored at Spruill’s residence, that he had seen armed individuals there on three occasions, and that there were dogs inside. First the officers suddenly broke down the front door with a battering ram. Then they heaved a stun grenade into the apartment where it exploded with a blinding white flash, a deafening bang, and a thunderous concussion. Then they stormed in and handcuffed Spruill, placing her face down on the floor. She was coughing and screaming. Spruill, who suffered from high blood pressure, then began having difficulty breathing. An ambulance for Spruill was dispatched at 6:32 a.m. When Spruill arrived at Harlem Hospital at 8 a.m. she was pronounced dead. She had suffered a fatal heart attack.

The medical examiner performed an autopsy and announced that Spruill suffered “sudden death following a police raid” as a result of shock and fear caused by the stun grenade explosion and the stress of being handcuffed. The medical examiner also officially classified Spruill’s death a homicide–a death caused by another person’s actions. “She really was scared to death,” The New York Daily News wrote the day after the medical examiner’s announcement.

Since it’s being stated by family members that the reason officers Jose and Mario Calvillo shot Bryan Jones was because he was startled by the flashbang device and was reacting to that as opposed to threatening law enforcement, the policy of the use of the flashbang and who gave the order as well as the larger issue as to the overall appropriateness of the flashbang device should be delved into.

9 Responses to “Sandusky shooting should raise questions about the use of flashbang devices”

  1. 1
    Mad Jack Says:

    How about not using SWAT teams?

    It isn’t the grenade AKA flash-bang device, and it isn’t the fully automatic battle rifle, nor is it the bullet resistant armor or the gas mask. It’s the people.

    Get it?

  2. 2
    LisaRenee Says:

    That’s another issue that could be raised, but it’s doubtful any police departments are going to stop using SWAT, which is why I suggested focusing on the methods they use.

  3. 3
    Mad Jack Says:

    SWAT is used far too often, although to the best of my knowledge no one counts the number of times a SWAT team gets deployed and, just as importantly, why SWAT is deployed.

    In Toledo, Ottawa Hills or the City of Sylvania I’m more likely to be shot by police than I am to be a victim of violent crime. Until the State government drops both steel toed jack boots right on top of the Toledo police, people will continue to get shot and killed and the police who did the shooting will get a commendation. Disgusting, isn’t it.

  4. 4
    LisaRenee Says:

    If you didn’t get a chance to read the link from 2003, I think it will really interest you. There probably are stats we could get as to how often SWAT is deployed and why – I’ll check into it.

  5. 5
    Mad Jack Says:

    Thanks, Lisa. I read the link, now I’m waiting for my blood pressure to return to normal.

    This deplorable misbehavior by police will continue to escalate until the police are held criminally culpable and the guilty are sent to prison. Instead, we have police like the Thomas Caine White waling around free while the appeal is pending.

  6. 6
    truthseeker Says:

    In so many of these cases, it seems like individuals like Bryan Jones could be “talked down” or waited out for a while. It’s like people who threaten suicide – what they often really want is some personal attention to their problems.

    I think too many police officers are in the wrong line of work. Too many are either too fearful or too gung ho (as in many high speed chases that result in bystander deaths). Maybe some of the real police watch too many TV police shows for their role models.

    Police officers bear heavy responsibilities. Their training should include – shooting to kill should be the last option, not the first.

  7. 7
    LisaRenee Says:

    I should have warned you Mad Jack – the concerns about the militarization of our police forces is one that is a part of this, especially when it comes to SWAT and the use of technology like the flashbang.

    There’s a mental health aspect to this story as well, when the first call was made had it been determined by health care professionals that Jones needed to be held, this might have been avoided.

  8. 8
    Robin Says:

    This whole situation is scary. I’m thinking who isn’t going to jump up and go after someone in a situation like that. I’m also thinking that if I’m ever in a situation where I need someone to talk someone else down, the police are the least capable to do that, unless I want the other person dead.

  9. 9
    Mad Jack Says:

    A certain percentage of the Toledo police are supposed to be trained to deal with mental health issues. I don’t know how extensive the training is or how many cops completed it.

    Robin is quite right. Do not call the police to help with suicide prevention, as at best they have no training and at worst suicide will no longer be an option for the victim.

    What really gets under my skin is best illustrated by the behavior of the SWAT team at Columbine High School when police believed one or more active shooters were inside. The SWAT team stayed outside and allowed the shooters free rein of the school. One person bled to death as a result of the SWAT inaction. On top of this, the big important police with all their military gear and special forces training refused to let the parents go in and rescue their own children.

    Of course if they outnumber a civilian six to one, they can always fall back on superior firepower and throw a grenade or two.

    Governor Strickland should get involved in this and start demanding answers.

© 2013 Glass City Jungle | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
Design inspired by Design Your Web Page - Powered By Blog Collector

Switch to our mobile site